Reading time: about 9 minutes
A pharmacy’s social accounts get abandoned for a very specific reason: deciding what to post costs more than posting it. Every day you have to invent a topic, and that does not fit into a day behind the counter. This case attacks exactly that bottleneck: you decide once a month, in one afternoon, and the rest is just posting.
Step by step
-
Pick four recurring themes and repeat them all year
What kills an account is variety, not repetition. Four recurring themes, one a week, and the month fills itself: for instance "a question from the counter", "a seasonal tip", "one of our services" and "behind the scenes" (who you are, what you do).
Repetition is what makes people know what to expect from you, and what makes the work sustainable. A calendar with twenty different themes gets abandoned in three weeks.
-
Ask for the whole month at once, with the rules inside
The same rules as the counter sign, plus two specific to social: no diagnosing in comments and no recommending a specific medicine to anybody. Written down, not remembered.
Act as the social media manager of a community pharmacy. Prepare a one month calendar for Instagram. MY FOUR RECURRING THEMES, one per week: 1. A question we get asked a lot at the counter 2. A seasonal tip 3. A service we offer 4. Behind the scenes: who we are MONTH: November. I post 3 times a week. AUDIENCE: local people, 30 to 70 TONE: warm but serious; no emoji in every sentence RULES YOU CANNOT BREAK: - Do NOT mention medicine brands. - Do NOT promise health outcomes ("eliminates", "cures", "prevents"). - Do NOT give dosing instructions or recommend a specific medicine. - Do NOT use efficacy figures or "studies show". - Every tip ends by inviting people to ask at the pharmacy. For each post give me: - date and which theme it belongs to - the text, ready to post - what photo would be needed (one I can take on my phone, in the shop) - 5 hashtags, including local ones And at the end, tell me which ones you think are weakest and why.
-
Read all twelve in a row and delete three
Read as a block you see something you cannot see one at a time: they all start the same way. "Did you know…", "At this time of year…", "A lot of customers ask us…". Spread over a month it shows, badly.
Delete the three weakest — it told you which at the end — and rewrite the opening of three more. That is enough. The calendar does not need to be perfect: it needs to exist.
And run the counter sign’s five "no"s over all of them. With twelve texts generated at once, something slipping through is likelier than when reviewing one.
-
Take all the photos in one go
The prompt asked for photos you can take on your phone in the shop, and this is why: take the list of twelve, walk round the place on a quiet Tuesday and shoot them all in one session.
The alternative — remembering to take a photo every three days — is exactly what killed the account the first time.
And watch what is in the background. A counter shot with a prescription on it, a screen showing a customer record, or a recognisable person waiting is a data protection problem, not an aesthetic slip. Check the background before posting, every time.
-
Schedule them and do not open the chat again for a month
Schedule the twelve wherever your tool lets you and close it. The month is done.
What you do have to do by hand, every day, is comments and messages: that is not automated and not delegated to a model. If somebody asks about their medication in a comment, the answer is "come by the pharmacy and we will look at it" — for the usual reason: you cannot advise somebody you have not seen and whose medication you do not know.
Next month, the same prompt with a different month and season. The second time it takes twenty minutes.
A full example, and what is wrong with it
The November calendar with the four recurring themes. Here are three of the twelve, chosen because each has a different problem.
4 Nov — Counter question: "Did you know taking ibuprofen on an empty stomach can damage your gastric lining? We recommend always taking it with food. Questions about your medication? Ask us."
11 Nov — Seasonal tip: "The cold is here and with it colds. Boost your defences with vitamin C and zinc, and do not forget vitamin D, essential in the months with less sun. Come in and we will advise you."
18 Nov — One of our services: "Taking several medicines a day and struggling to keep track? With our dose administration service we prepare your weekly medication in blisters. No more confusion. Ask us."
And now, what is wrong with that reply:
- The 11th is a product recommendation to nobody in particular. "Boost your defences with vitamin C and zinc" is advice with no patient present: you do not know who is reading, what they take or what is wrong. And "boost your defences" is a promised health outcome on top. That is the one to rewrite completely, and it is the one most like what everybody else posts.
- All three start the same way: with a question to the reader. "Did you know…?", "Are you taking…?". On screen one at a time you do not notice; read all twelve in a row, it is the only thing you see. That is why step 3 says read them as a block — one at a time they all look fine.
- The 18th is the only one that works, for a specific reason. It talks about something you do, not about what a product achieves. It describes the service, says who it is for, and ends by inviting a question. It promises no health outcome at any point. That is the mental template for the whole calendar: if a post can be rewritten as "we do this here", it is fine.
- And the 4th is right in substance and wrong in form. The advice is correct and genuinely useful. What is surplus is "we recommend", which turns general information into a personal instruction. "It is generally recommended with some food" says the same without prescribing to anybody — and the difference is three words.
Of twelve posts, one to bin, one needing three words changed, and the rest sharing an opening. That is a normal and good result: the calendar works, and what it needs is twenty minutes with the scissors.
And the rule that settles most borderline cases fits on one line: if what you publish describes what you do, it is fine; if it describes what a product achieves, rewrite it.