The phone script for the calls that always go sideways

Reading time: about 9 minutes

The situation. There are two or three calls that always end badly: the patient asking about their medication who cannot be understood, the doctor calling in a hurry, the rep who will not hang up. And everyone on the team handles them their own way.

A phone script is not a text to read out — that sounds terrible and people notice — it is a sequence of questions in the right order. The order is what saves the call, and the order is exactly what can be sorted out in five minutes.

What you need to hand: Knowing which call you want to fix and what information you need to have when you hang up. That second part is what almost nobody is clear on, and it is why the call takes eight minutes.

Step by step

Write first what you need to have when you hang up

Three or four pieces of information, no more. For "patient asking whether their thing has arrived": who they are (without their whole life story), exactly which product, whether they have a prescription, and when they can come by.

Anything not on that list is conversation. Conversation is fine — this is a pharmacy — but it is not what structures the script.

Ask for the script as questions and branches

What makes a phone script useful are the branches: if they say this, then; if they say that, then. Without branches it is a monologue and it does not survive the caller’s second sentence.

Act as someone who writes phone-handling scripts for a small pharmacy
team.

THE CALL: <<a patient calling to find out whether something they
ordered has arrived>>
WHAT I NEED WHEN I HANG UP: <<who they are, exactly which product,
whether they have a prescription, when they can come in>>
WHO PICKS UP: anyone on the team, including a technician

Give me:
1. The opening line (one line, natural, not corporate).
2. The questions IN ORDER, with half a line on why that order.
3. The branches: "if they say X, then…", for the 3 most frequent cases.
4. THE RED LINE: in which situations whoever picks up must hand the call
   to the pharmacist, phrased so it does not sound like an excuse.
5. The closing line, repeating what was agreed.

Rules:
- No paragraphs to read out: short questions.
- On the phone we do NOT give treatment advice and do NOT confirm what
  anybody takes without knowing who we are speaking to. Make that
  explicit in point 4.
- One page maximum.

You rewrite the red line yourself

Point 4 is the only one that is not organisation: it is responsibility. Read it carefully and put it in your own words, because it is the one somebody on your team will use alone on a Saturday morning.

And make it easy to comply with: give a concrete handover line ("I am passing you to the pharmacist, she will explain it better, do not hang up"). Without that line people improvise — and improvising is what you were trying to avoid.
The sentence that ends the call, which is always the one missing

The scripts an AI gives you assume the call progresses. They do not cover the call that cannot be resolved by phone and does not end, which is exactly the one that goes sideways.

You need three written sentences, written literally, because improvising them with somebody insisting on the other end goes badly:

To refer: "I need to see this, I am not happy saying it over the phone. Can you come in, or shall I call you once I have looked at it?"
To close without resolving: "I cannot confirm that right now. I will look into it and call you before <>." — and then you call, even if only to say it is still unknown.
For when they insist: "I understand, and I still cannot give you that over the phone. It is for your safety, not a rule of ours."

The third is the one people are most glad to have written down. And all three share something: they do not just say no, they say what happens next. A call goes wrong when the person hangs up not knowing what is going to happen.
Test it by calling yourself

Seriously. Have somebody on the team call you playing the difficult patient — the one who does not know the product name, the one who gives three facts at once, the one who asks something clinical — and follow the script.

It falls apart in forty seconds and that shows you which branch is missing. A script never tested out loud is a document; one that has been is a tool.

A full example, and what is wrong with it

The brief: the "have you got this?" call, the one that goes sideways most often. This came back.

What it replies

1. Greeting: "Pharmacy [Name], [your name] speaking, how can I help?"

2. Identify the product: "Can you tell me the exact name as it appears on the box?"

3. If in stock: confirm format and price, and offer to hold it until closing.

4. If not: offer to order it with a timeframe, or check whether an equivalent alternative exists.

5. Close: "Anything else? Have a good day."

Note: maintain a cordial and resolutive tone throughout.

And now, what is wrong with that reply:

Step 4 hides a dispensing decision made over the phone. "Check whether an equivalent alternative exists" sounds like service and is blind pharmaceutical advice: you do not know who is calling, what they take or what they want it for. If the product is prescription-only, the conversation should not have got there at all. The script lists it as one more routine step, and it is the only one of the five with consequences.
It assumes the caller is the patient. All five steps are written for somebody asking about their own thing. In a pharmacy, a large share of calls come from a son, a carer or a neighbour — and that changes what you can say and to whom. The script never asks who it is for, so whoever uses it never will.
There is no exit for the call that cannot be resolved. All five steps advance and end well. The real case is missing: the person who insists, who asks something unanswerable by phone, who wants you to say whether they can take it with what they already take. That is the call that goes sideways, and it is the only one the script does not cover.
"Cordial and resolutive tone" is not an instruction. Nobody ever picked up a phone intending to be unpleasant. A note like that takes a line and changes no call; what does change one is having the exact wording to close written down, which is what gets improvised badly with somebody insisting on the other end.

The script covers the easy call well, which is the one that did not need a script. What it needs adding are the three sentences from step 3 and one more question in step 2: "is it for you?".

That question looks like a formality and is the one that most changes the conversation: the answer tells you whether you are speaking to the person who takes the medicine or to somebody relaying, and that decides what you can say and what has to wait until the person comes in.

And if your pharmacy is not like that

If the call is from a care home or a clinic. That is a different script, and it should be: there you do have an established relationship, an identifiable contact and usually an agreed procedure. What changes is that what is agreed needs recording in writing — and the counter script does not cover that.

If they ring asking the price of something. It is the shortest call and the most often mishandled, because the price gets quoted and the phone gets hung up. Two seconds more — "shall I hold one for you?" — turns that call into a sale surprisingly often. It is not a complicated script: it is remembering the question.

If whoever picks up changes daily. Then the script does not live in a document: it lives printed beside the phone, on one sheet, with the three closing sentences in bold. A script you have to remember having read does not exist when the phone rings at a quarter to two on a Friday.

If calls divert to a mobile out of hours. There you need one more sentence and it goes first: say where you are answering from. "I am not at the pharmacy, I do not have the system in front of me" resets the expectations of the whole call and prevents half the misunderstandings.

When it does not work first time

The written script sounds robotic when I read it aloud.

Because it is written to be read, not said. Read it aloud and rewrite whatever you would not say: usually the connectors and the long verbs. A good phone script looks badly written and sounds right spoken.

I forget to use it the moment things get busy.

Normal, and that is why you do not memorise it whole. Of the three closing sentences, learn one — the "I cannot give you that over the phone" — and keep the other two in view. A script is a safety net for the bad moment, not a libretto for the whole call.

The person insists and I end up giving in.

Giving in on the phone usually comes from having nowhere to go after the "no". That is why all three sentences end with what happens next: somebody who hangs up knowing you will call before seven does not insist. It is the same mechanism as the difficult email — a date closes a conversation better than an argument.

They ask by phone for something I could dispense to them.

Then the script works: confirm, hold it, dispense when they come in. What does not change is that the advice happens at the counter — holding is not dispensing, and the "will this be right for me?" conversation happens with the person in front of you, not on the phone.

Before you use what it gave you

The red line is in your own words and has a concrete handover sentence.
There are at least three branches, not a monologue.
No question forces anyone to confirm on the phone what somebody takes.
You have tested it out loud once.
You have the refer sentence, the close-without-resolving one and the one for when they insist.
None of them says no without saying what happens next.
The script covers the caller not being the patient.

It comes out too corporate. "You are through to X Pharmacy, how may I assist you?" is not how anyone really speaks and the caller hears it. Swap it for what you already say — the script is there to order things, not to change your voice.

It forgets the person calling on someone else’s behalf. That is half a pharmacy’s calls and the one needing most care. If it is not in the branches, ask for it separately.

It assumes the caller is the patient. A large share of a pharmacy’s calls come from a son, a carer or a neighbour. It changes what you can say and to whom. If the script does not distinguish that case, ask for it — and you decide where the limit is, which is not a drafting decision.

It writes you a call-centre script. Complete with "may I place you on hold while I check?" and a three-line sign-off. In a neighbourhood pharmacy that sounds corporate and creates distance, which is the opposite of what you want. Tell it the pharmacy is small and the callers are usually known — it changes the whole register.

Now, with your own. Ask your team tomorrow which call they least like picking up. That is the one. And write the script with them there: what comes out of that they will use, and what you write alone stays in a drawer.

← All practical cases Back to the school →

The phone script for the calls that always go sideways

Step by step

Write first what you need to have when you hang up

Ask for the script as questions and branches

You rewrite the red line yourself

The sentence that ends the call, which is always the one missing

Test it by calling yourself

A full example, and what is wrong with it

And if your pharmacy is not like that

When it does not work first time

Before you use what it gave you